1. Allow a slight encroachment of the Lot 26 dwelling unit and the placement of the primary and backup septic systems in the 275 foot buffer along the Turnpike. Or, as an alternative, reduce the front yard setback in order to move the house up.
   
2. Reduce the 50 foot access strip to the Benjamin Thomas parcel to 20 feet, to allow for adjustment of the adjacent lots to reduce the impact on the Turnpike buffer.
   
3. Allow the placement of a primary and backup drip irrigation system in the open space along Yellow Spring Road near Lots #12 & 13 for Lot #12.
   
4. Allow the placement of a backup drip irrigation system in the open space area behind Lot #37.
   

The table of bids is available as a small Acrobat PDF file.
Click here to download the file.

1. That the property must be used for public park, recreational and natural resources conservation only;
2. If #1 is deemed inappropriate, it must then be used for passive recreation or open space;
3. The terms are perpetual, and no additional restrictions may be imposed without the County's consent;
4. The municipality shall manage and develop the property in a manner that preserves the integrity of natural resources.
   

1. Bob Jones asked if the 29 acres to be under covenant can be transferred to another parcel. Mr. Gladden said yes, if the parcel is adjacent and allows for a similar or greater potential use.
   
2. Bob Elmer asked if the 29 acres must be contiguous with the 20.6 acre parcel, and Mr. Gladded said ideally, yes. Mr. Elmer asked if fees can be charged for programs, and Mr. Gladden said in most cases, yes, giving examples of a fundraiser for the park or a community day picnic. Mr. Elmer asked about a partnership with the Great Valley Nature Center and whether they could use the land in exchange for the charging of fees for their expertise and educators. Mr. Gladden said this would probably be acceptable. He explained that there are many gray areas that would have to be evaluated on a case by case basis.
   
3. Phil Staas asked if the 29 acres must be improved beyond passive farm fields, and Mr. Gladden said there can be as little as a walking trail, but he stressed that the County expects some public use of the space. Mr. Staas stated his concern over more expensive public improvements such as a playground, and Mr. Gladden said this is not required.
   
4. A man who did not identify himself asked if provisions for parking are required, and Mr. Gladden said no, although it is permitted, along with uses such as ball fields, trails, or a tot lot.
   
5. Louse Cantrell-Kehoe expressed an interest in developing a horse ring for the Pickering Pony Club, which requires membership to join. The club is open to all individuals ages 6-21. Mr. Gladden said he would have to look into whether this use would be permitted.
   
6. Vincent Kling asked if the property could be maintained as farmland, perhaps 50-60% of it, and Mr. Gladden said it isn't the intention of the CCPC for grant-acquired land to be used for this purpose. Mr. Kling stated his concern that users of the park would have to drive there, that there is no good walk-in residential area close by with the exception of the proposed Deerfield subdivision across the street. Mr. Gladden agreed that the Visioning committee should take this into account.
   
7. A woman who did not identify herself asked if it is an underlying principle of the grant program that the public is able to use the land with no fees required. Mr. Gladden said somewhat; there can be no exclusive use claimed by an organization or league. A fee tied to an activity to cover costs is acceptable. He said many Townships audit the books of these groups to determine that they are operating on a non-profit basis.
   
8. Ben Bingham asked if the Township is considering use of part of the property as a self-sustaining farm, how a walkway could be installed without disruption to crops and animals. Mr. Gladden said this could be explored, but suggested that any commercial hub must remain outside county restricted land.
   
9. Mr. Jones asked if the restrictions could be withdrawn in the future if the money was repaid, and Mr. Gladden said no, it is a permanent covenant on the land.
   
10. Mrs. Staas asked about maintenance issues, and whether the Pony Club could be charged rent for their use of the property. Mr. Gladden said probably, yes, or an exchange of maintenance for some scheduled exclusive use could be worked out.
    
11. Debbie Kuhn asked if a community garden arrangement, where people could till 20x20 foot tracts for personal gardening, could be done. Mr. Gladden responded no.
    
12. Alix Coleman asked who makes the decision on what can and cannot be done on the restricted portion of the property, and Mr. Gladden said the County makes the determination upon advice from their Solicitor.
    
13. A woman who did not identify herself asked, isn't parking required? Mr. Gladden answered no.
    
14. Rick Reis asked if there are guidelines on what percentage of exclusive use is permitted, and Mr. Gladden said the schedule for activities is managed at the municipal level, but the County will monitor the concessionaire agreements.
    

1. Mark Connolly asked if concessionaire agreements, such as the two in place at Charlestown Park for the Phoenixville Area Soccer Club (PASC) and Phoenixville Marion Youth Club (PMYC), which automatically renew for a 7-year period, could be utilized. These two organizations provide the programming for sports events and league play and maintain the facilities. They have exclusive use of certain storage facilities and a snack bar. Mr. McErlane said this can be done as long as the groups are non-profit.
   
2. Ben Bingham asked if a cooperative Community Supported Agriculture program (CSA) would be acceptable if run by the Township with an annually contracted hired manager, and Mr. McErlane answered yes.
   
3. Bob Jones asked if the restrictions apply to the land after the bond issue is paid off, and Mr. McErlane said no. The Treasurer noted that the bond issue will be paid off in 2029.
   
4. Mr. Connolly asked, if a non-profit organization was chartered and transacted the management of the entire farm, providing public programs, would that be acceptable. Mr. McErlane said yes, assuming the use was reasonable.
   
5. Mrs. Staas asked if the CSA made a profit but put it back into improvements to the farm, would that be acceptable, and Mr. McErlane said yes.
   
6. Paul Hogan, Supervisor, asked about a military vehicle organization using one of the structures to provide an educational and historical function. Mr. McErlane said if non-profit, this would be acceptable.
   
7. Phil Staas asked if the County grant funding of $450,000 could be used to pay down the bond issue so the bond funds could be used elsewhere. Mr. McErlane said that this could be done in the short term only, otherwise arbitrage comes into play, meaning that it's not legal to take the federal funding and hold it indefinitely in order to earn interest on it. The funds would have to be used to acquire additional open space within a short period of time.
   

1. A woman who did not identify herself asked if the Township plans to send out a survey to Township residents asking what uses they'd like to see at the park. Mr. Theurkauf said that the intention was to conduct a public visioning process of perhaps four additional sessions in order to achieve the broadest reception. The next step would be to develop a land use plan.
   
2. Bob Jones asked if the land use plan is part of the present proposal with Thomas Comitta Associates, and Mr. Theurkauf answered no.
   
3. Jacob Merriwether asked how the 29 acres of the 55 acre Brightside Farm would be delineated for restriction under the county regulations. Mr. Theurkauf said he'll provide recommendations to be reviewed and discussed.
   
4. Mrs. Staas asked if the 29 restricted acres must be all together or can be a combination of separate pieces, and Mr. Gladden said they can be delineated in any way.
   
5. Jim Scharnberg suggested that the delineation be made dependent on the natural footprint of the property. Mr. Theurkauf agreed that the physical and visual attributes of the property would be taken into consideration.
   
6. Joanna Reed asked how the farm would be maintained while this visioning process is underway, stating her concern that farmland deteriorates rapidly without maintenance. Mr. Theurkauf explained that the Township has an area farmer managing the fields and that they have not been left fallow. Mr. Elmer added that the Brightside Farm Committee looked at each field, its past history, and made determinations on how to best maintain and preserve them. The Chester County Soil Conservation group came in and gave advice also. Winter rye was planted last fall, and spring oats have now been planted this year.
   
7. Mike Rodgers, Supervisor asked for clarification that the same County restrictions must be imposed on the 20.6 acre adjacent parcel in order to be eligible for the Round 10 grant, and Mr. Gladden said yes, they must be restricted. Mr. Theurkauf said this means 49 acres out of the total 75 will be under County restrictions. Mr. Elmer asked if all 49 acres can be incorporated on the Brightside Farm parcel, and Mr. Gladden said the County would consider such a delineation and make recommendations.
   
8. Dale Frens suggested that prolonging the Visioning process will not be constructive, as people will lose continuity.
   
9. A man who did not identify himself said a framework and timeline should be established and published for the general public, and Mr. Theurkauf agreed. The man asked who would take charge of the process, and Mr. Theurkauf responded, the Supervisors. A person with a specific proposed use for one of the structures would go to Dale Frens to determine which building might be suitable.
   
10. A woman who did not identify herself suggested that residents bring ideas to the next meetings, and indicated her interest in historical, cultural, art and science uses. Mr. Theurkauf said it would be advisable to think of the uses as they interrelate to one another.
    
11. Kevin Kuhn, Supervisor, said a mechanism for reviewing proposals against the 2 stringent levels of restrictions is needed, so time is not wasted on ideas that cannot be utilized. Mr. McErlane suggested that he and Mr. Gladden can review outlines of concepts.
    
12. A woman who did not identify herself recommended that people come out and walk the mowed trail to look over the property. Mr. Elmer invited the public to come on Sunday, April 28th to help clean up the area in celebration of Earth Week, and take time to walk the trails at this time. Mr. Hogan added that anyone with a pick up truck would be especially welcome.
    
13. Mrs. Kuhn asked for the location of the trail and parking area. Mr. Hogan showed it on the site plan. Alix Coleman asked how wide the trail is, and Mr. Hogan responded 6 feet.
    
14. Mrs. Kuhn stated her concern for the costs associated with various uses, and Mr. Theurkauf said fiscal needs will be outlined and included as part of each proposal in order to determine which programs are conceptually viable.