CHARLESTOWN OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
Minutes
February 16, 2005
Commission Members Attending Meeting:
Andy Motel, Chair x, William Andersen x, Alexandra Coleman x, Bob Jones x, Kevin Kuhn x, Rosemary Philips x, Bob Roggio _, Marcia Solda _, Sue
Staas x .
Minutes from November meeting. There were no minutes from November meeting.
New Business:
1. Reorganization: Sue Staas, Chair.
Vice Chair - Open
Andy Motel, Landowner Liaison
John Pickering, Secretary
Bob Roggio. Treasurer
Many thanks to Andy from the OS Commission for all his hard work! HE IS NOT GOING AWAY!
2. Reorganized method of doing business:
¤ The OS commission will be meeting approximately every two months on an as-needed basis.
¤ Tasks will be discussed at meetings, assigned and highlighted in the minutes.
¤ The more we can accomplish between meetings, the less often we will have to meet!
3. New Members: The Commission could use about 3 more members.
Desirable skills for a member of the Commission (Not all to be found in one person!) include:
¤ Tax knowledgeable
¤ PR knowledgeable
¤ Writing skills
¤ Willing to work
¤ Event organizer
¤ Knowledge of grants
¤ Well-connected
in the Township
Commission
members are encouraged to recruit new members.
B. Procedure that was decided at September OS meeting follows:
á Solicit possible new member
á Circulate his/her resume to members of the OS Commission
á Invite prospective member to attend next OS meeting in April to see if they want to be a part.
á Commission will discuss and invite prospect to join the commission.
C. Roz Epstein was suggested. (Kevin will contact her).
4. Open Space Commission's Mission for 2005:
¤ Make Open Space the primary and most desirable issue in the township.
¤ Bring the desirability and advantages of developing large tracts of land to conserve open space to the attention of all large landowners.
¤ Build
trust in the Township's ability to work with landowners to develop win-win
solutions to their land development issues.
5. Public Relations Plan for 2005:
A. An information session for large landowners in the spring.
¤ Preceded
by a questionnaire whose purpose would be discover topics around land planning
that are of particular concern. We
need two people to draft a questionnaire.
Volunteers, please?
¤ Session
would feature a speaker, refreshments and could be held in a private home. John Pickering will recommend
speakers when we know what we want.
We need an offer of a house for the session.
B. A celebration of the completion of the Stonorov plan to be held in the Fall, probably
¤ Feature Eddie Scott, the consultant who is working with the Stonorovs.
¤ This will be a big event - feature as an example of what can happen.
¤ The Stonorov Plan is to be introduced in the Twp. newsletter due out any minute.
Rosemary has suggested that
we focus on newsletters and website for now; and that we kick off our
information sessions with the celebration and presentation by Eddie Scott; and
follow up with another info session.
I need feedback from you on
that, please. Please include all
OS members in your reply.
C. A continuous communication effort via the Charlestown Website and the Township Newsletters, which are published quarterly.
¤ It will be the responsibility of all OS members to find and contribute articles and information to the website; and to volunteer to write articles.
¤ All information to be published should be passed by Linda Csete first.
Please volunteer to
contribute an article about OS to the website or to the newsletter. (Deadline for next newsletter is April
26).
6. Suggested
Agenda items for next meeting: Please
send agenda items to Sue before the next meeting which is scheduled for April
20.
Agenda items so far:
¤ OS
Commission input into the township map.
Respectfully submitted,
Sue Staas
Secretary
CHARLESTOWN
OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
Minutes
April 20, 2005
(NOTE TIME CHANGE!)
Commission Members Attending Meeting:
William Andersen x, Alexandra Coleman _, Bob Jones _, Andy Motel x, Rosemary
Philips x, Bob Roggio _, Marcia Solda x, Sue Staas, Chair x .
Guests: Vincent Kling and Peter Goodman
Sue Staas introduced Peter Goodman, a Charlestown resident, who is very active with Trout Unlimited and therefore familiar with watershed issues. Peter is a member of the Nature Center Board, and represents Trout Unlimited in Tredyffrin Township. At SueÕs request he attended the OS meeting to Òlook us over.Ó
Minutes from February meeting were accepted on motion.
Agenda Items:
Sue Staas introduced Vince Pompo, partner at Lamb, McErlane and Twp. Supervisor in East Bradford who spoke to the Open Space Commission on the subject of a municipalities responsibilities and challenges as they work to preserve open space.
East Bradford Township can serve as an important model for CharlestownÕ efforts. In the seven years their Open Space efforts have been seriously pursued, East Bradford has passed two EIT referendums dedicated to OS. The first passed with 60% approval, the second with over 70% approval. Proceeds from the EIT have funded a bond issue of $12M, which, combined with grants, has so far funded the purchase of easements and the preservation of 900 acres. The township still has $7M to devote to OS preservation, and the effort is ongoing. East Bradford is almost exactly the same size as Charlestown!
The efforts at preservation have focused on watersheds and on connectivity Ð so that the township is slowly building a ÒspineÓ of connected, preserved land. It should also be noted that trails are included in the plans.
VinceÕs comments on the use of the official map in East Bradford was particularly instructive. Notes following are from an email Andy Motel sent to OS and Planning Commissions and Supervisors after the meeting:
Vince touched on the use of the Official Map in East Bradford as but
one planning tool EB uses widely (and effectively, in my opinion)
as a "safety net" by placing many parcels on the
Map, and using the Open Space Lands Act as the device to raise an
EIT tax (twice) and rate properties for easement negotiation.
Under the Lands Act the municipality passes an ordinance, then raises the tax,
sets up a rating/ranking system and uses its Recreation Plan as a rationale for
land it intends to preserve (we did one in '93 and it sets forth the same
areas we essentially focus on saving now)
It is noteworthy that being designated on the Official Map in
EB is regarded favorably by the landowners (with one exception). This was apparently
accomplished by stressing that landowners had "options"--like
getting fair value from the Township. In fact, the Map is prominently
featured at the annual Open Space dinner attended by the big landowners and they love to
see their land on the Map. Vince said it was critical that landowners
feel they were not being forced to dispose of their land in any one way, but
rather the BOS told landowners that the Township could not very
well prioritize ($$) their land for preservation via their
ordinance under the Lands Act without also placing the land on the Official
Map. They accepted that rationale. In EB only one property designated on the
Map has ever triggered the one year clock and EB is negotiating with
that landowner now. Thus far, EB has completed 11 or 12 separate
deals with landowners since 1999, all done via the Open Space Lands Act,
with the Official Map in the background as a safety net. Once they got
funding in place their OS preservation credibility took off. Maybe we can
expect the same "bounce" this year
EB's tax at 1/2%, is all devoted to open space
preservation. Presently, it generates about $600,000 annually and
the EB has used the cash flow to float a 12 million dollar bond, of which
they have spent about half. Like us, EB:
1. seeks easements, and
tries to avoid the ownership responsibilities of a purchase
2. does NOT make public
access a stipulation (the Lands Act specifically states that looking at the
preserved land from the road is enough "public" benefit)
3. sends newsletters to
all EB residents 4 times per year; does the one annual dinner inviting the
big landowners; and
4. expresses no
preference between land trusts an owner chooses to work with (the NLT and
Brandywine hold easements in EB)
5. EB considered and
dismissed the idea of creating its own land trust as unnecessarily duplicative
in light of existing trusts.
Agenda for next meeting:
Meeting adjourned 9:30 p.m..
Respectfully submitted:
Rosemary Philips
Andy Motel
Sue Staas
CHARLESTOWN OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
Minutes
June 1, 2005
(NOTE DATE CHANGE!)
Commission Members Attending Meeting:
William
Andersen x, Alexandra Coleman _, Bob Jones _, Andy Motel x, Rosemary Philips x, John Pickering x, Bob Roggio _,
Marcia Solda _, Sue
Staas, Chair x .
Guests: None
Minutes from the April meeting were accepted on
motion.
Agenda
Items:
1. Discussion on +/- of having
multiple layers on the Open Space map denoting properties of higher or lower
attractiveness. Agreed that
because we canÕt know when any property might become available, we should name
a single layer of Òproperties of interest.Ó
2. The Commission went through the
Base Map very carefully, discussing all large properties specifically, and many
smaller properties that have unique qualities, including as ÒconnectorÓ
properties that create green belts.
These could be critical to any future trail development. We marked properties that we felt the
Supervisors should be especially aware of, and agreed that that marked map
would be forwarded to the Supervisors by Sue Staas (done).
3
An OSC member questioned a reference in Ordinance #109-2003, specifically
paragraph 3.1.1, where the Board of Supervisors is given 45 days to react to a
plan for subdivision. It was the
consensus of the OSC that this is too short a time, and we recommended to the
BOS that they consider an amendment to the Ordinance.
4
We considered the timing of our Fall Event, and tentatively chose the second
weekend in October (Saturday is October 8, and is Columbus Day weekend). We will likely need to push ahead with
panning for this event via email, before our next meeting.
Agenda for
next meeting:
5 Fall Event - We need a venue
and date for the celebration of the Stonorov preservation.
6 Bob Roggio needs guidance for
his questionnaire. What do we want
to learn from landowners?
Meeting
adjourned 9:30 p.m..
Respectfully
submitted:
John Pickering
CHARLESTOWN OPEN SPACE
COMMISSION
Minutes
September 21, 2005
NEXT MEETING is now
scheduled for Wednesday, October 19, 2005.
Providing
we have agenda items. Please send suggestions to Sue
Staas.
Commission Members
Attending Meeting:
William Andersen _, Alexandra Coleman _, Bob Jones _, Andy Motel x, Rosemary Philips x, John Pickering _, Bob Roggio _, Marcia Solda _, Sue Staas, Chair x .
Guests: Kevin Kuhn
Minutes: With no quorum, minutes were not accepted.
Agenda
Items:
Respectfully
Submitted
Sue
Staas
Chair
BUDGET FOR OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
2006
The Open Space Commission
recognizes that the structure of the Open Space effort in Charlestown will be
changing when the Township hires a coordinator. Therefore, we are only requesting a budget to operate the
commission, itself.
We anticipate spending the
$5500 we are requesting as follows:
1. Speakers
(primarily a presentation of the Planning CommissionÕs Open Space
Buildout scenario. $500
2. Community Outreach: $5000
a. Charlestown Day Ð Perhaps a township hike on the
trails in the township followed by a picnic. Refreshments, printing, postage, Buses.
b. The HST committee would like to host a meeting of
trail hosts, hikers, and township officials. Refreshments, printing, postage, etc., will be required.
I have based our outreach
budget on the 2003 actual figures, when we spent $5100 for Charlestown
Day. For the same amount, 3 years
later, I hope we can sponsor two events Ð Charlestown Day and a smaller HST
meeting.